
Showing posts with label wes craven. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wes craven. Show all posts
August 27, 2009
...They (2002)
They is presented by Wes Craven as a horror film but with no real thrills where's the horror? The story, about children and their adult selves with night terrors, apes the much better Darkness Falls and becomes more annoying as it wears on. The PG-13 rating doesn't help because with no story and no blood and guts I ask again, where's the horror?


Labels:
*,
00s,
wes craven
February 8, 2009
...The Hills Have Eyes II (2007)
The Hills Have Eyes II is another mutant cannibals massacre film with a lot of blood and guts and real cringe-inducing scenes (from the first frame!) But the soldiers being hunted were stupid and not worth caring about making the whole thing leave a bad taste in my mouth (despite, or maybe because of, original The Hills Have Eyes writer/director Wes Carven's involvement.) And that's hard to do.


Labels:
*,
00s,
wes craven
February 22, 2008
The Hills Have Eyes: 6 lines about 2 movies
92% of director/co-writer Alexandre Aja's The Hills Have Eyes (2006) remains intact from director Wes Craven's The Hills Have Eyes (1977); a back story has been added to the former that seeks to put the blame for the cannibalistic clan on you, me and these here United States of America rather than the lone gas station owner of the original. The remake has crackling edits, uber-realistic makeup effects, and plenty of gore while the original still has the power of...um...originality and the type of gore that is realistic without being over-the-top. The acting in the remake is first-rate (which was not always the case in the original) with special kudos to Emilie de Raven for shucking her Lost character and her Australian accent as well as Kathleen Quinlan for just having the balls to get down and dirty in a horror film. (I enjoyed Virginia Vincent as Ethel Carter in the original but haven't seen hide nor hair of her since.) The remake's back story is interesting and allowed for a fascinating look at some historical desert happenings but it added length to the film while the original was tightly edited with nary a wasted frame. All in all, the remake is a worthy update but see the original first - you'll be glad you did.




Labels:
****,
alexandre aja,
horror,
wes craven
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
